000			03108cam a2200397 i 4500
999			_c433930 _d433830
001			19326170
003			KE-NaHC
005			20230411094009.0
008			161004s2017 enk b 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2016955719
015			_aGBB6F0091 _2bnb
020			_a9780198788775 (hbk.)
020			_a0198788770 (hbk.)
035			_a(OCoLC)ocn966971059
040			_aNLE _beng _erda _cNLE _dOCLCO _dBDX _dEMI _dYDX _dOCLCF _dCOO _dDLC
042			_alccopycat
050	0	0	_aKB867.5 SYE _b.S94 2017
082	0	4	_aKB 867.5 SYE _223
100	1		_aSyed, Mairaj U., _eauthor. _9127633
245	1	0	_aCoercion and responsibility in Islam : _ba study in ethics and law / _cMairaj U. Syed, Assistant Professor, University of California, Davis.
250			_aFirst edition.
300			_axiii, 259 pages ; _c24 cm.
490	0		_aOxford Islamic legal studies
500			_aBased on the author's thesis (doctoral)--Princeton, 2011.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 243-252) and index.
505	0		_aCompulsion and moral agency in Mu'tazilism -- Coercion and moral agency in Ash'arism -- Defining coercion in Hanafism -- Defining coercion in Shafi'ism -- Coerced speech act jurisprudence in Hanafism and Shafi'ism -- Coerced Harm Jurisprudence in Hanafism and Shafi'ism -- Conclusion.
520			_a"In 'Coercion and Responsibility in Islam', Mairaj Syed explores how classical Muslim theologians and jurists from four intellectual traditions argue about the thorny issues that coercion raises about responsibility for one's action. This is done by assessing four ethical problems: whether the absence of coercion or compulsion is a condition for moral agency; how the law ought to define what is coercive; coercion's effect on the legal validity of speech acts; and its effects on moral and legal responsibility in the cases of rape and murder. Through a comparative and historical examination of these ethical problems, the book demonstrates the usefulness of a new model for analyzing ethical thought produced by intellectuals working within traditions in a competitive pluralistic environment. The book compares classical Muslim thought on coercion with that of modern Western thinkers on these issues and finds significant parallels between them. The finding suggests that a fruitful starting point for comparative ethical inquiry, especially inquiry aimed at the discovery of common ground for ethical action, may be found in an examination of how ethicists from different traditions considered concrete problems."--Publsher's website
650		0	_aDuress (Islamic law) _9127634
650		0	_aIslam and justice. _92479
650		7	_aDuress (Islamic law) _2fast _9127634
650		7	_aIslam and justice. _2fast _92479
830		0	_aOxford Islamic legal studies. _9127635
906			_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _eepcn _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK